Coalition
for
Ukraine
A personal note:
I'm a tech entrepreneur and concerned citizen trying to support Ukraine. I hope to rally suppport for companies pulling out of Russia, and add pressure on those that still remain, by providing you info to share in social media. Thank you for your support! - Alex Algard
CORPORATIONS SUPPORTING UKRAINE:
An Accounting of Who's Pulling Out and Who's Continuing Business With Russia
The brutal Russian invasion of Ukraine is being fought on many fronts, including the economic front. Corporations have made various announcements regarding Ukraine and Russia, but what are their actual actions to help prevent more bloodshed? As of November 24, we are tracking 1217 companies, of which 953 are pulling out of Russia, and 264 holdouts (highlighted in red) are mostly continuing to do business as usual in Russia. Review the list, take action (here and directly), tweet and share!
SHOW YOUR SUPPORT | DEMAND ACTION
LIST OF COMPANIES
Categories
Headquarters
All
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bermuda
Brazil
Canada
China
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Czechia
Denmark
England
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Kazakhstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Malta
Mexico
Monaco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Romania
Serbia
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
UAE
UK
USA
Ukraine
Vietnam
| Company | Headquarters | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|
 | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld HQ: USALaw Services | March 15: Departing Russian market | |
 | Allen & Overy HQ: UKLaw Services | March 10: Close Moscow office (111 staff) | |
 | Arendt & Medernach HQ: LuxembourgLaw | March 8: Pulled out of Russia and closed office in Moscow. We will not accept new mandates from Russia, Russian state-owned enterprises or entities controlled by, or under the influence of, the Russian state, or connected with the current Russian regime. | |
 | Baker Botts HQ: USALaw Services | March 15: Departing Russian market, Closed Moscow Office | |
 | Baker McKenzie HQ: USALaw Services | July 11: Exited Russian operations as former offices launch as independent firm | |
 | Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner HQ: UKLaw Services | April 28: Departed Russian market by spinning its Russia base into independent law firm | |
 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton HQ: USALaw Services | March 8: Temporarily paused business in Russia | |
 | Clifford Chance HQ: UKLaw Services | March 10: Closed Moscow office | |
 | CMS HQ: UKLaw | March 14: Leaving the Russian market- Moscow office continues as an independent law firm (80 employees) | |
 | Debevoise & Plimpton HQ: USALaw Services | March 15: Ceasing Russian operations | |
 | Dechert HQ: USALaw Services | March 15: Closed Moscow office | |
 | Dentons HQ:Law Services | December 15: Divesting Russian operations (250 staff in Moscow) | |
 | DLA Piper HQ: UKLaw Services | March 14: Divesting Russian business (200 staff in Moscow and St Petersburg) | |
 | Eversheds Sutherland HQ: UKLaw Services | April 27: Ceased its Russia operations, after announcing all of its people would transfer to a newly-launched separate offering called Birch Legal. | |
 | Fieldfisher HQ: UKLaw Services | March 8: Will categorically decline any new instructions for state-backed Russian entities and will terminate all Russia-related instructions that facilitate the Russian military action in Ukraine. | |
 | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer HQ: UKLaw Services | April 22: Closed Moscow and St Petersburg offices. Trying to withdraw as counsel for a sanctioned Russian state-owned bank in a U.S. lawsuit | |
 | Gowling HQ: UKLaw Services | March 10: Closed Moscow office (30 lawyers) | |
 | Herbert Smith Freehills HQ: UKLaw Services | March 15: Departed Russian market | |
 | Hogan Lovells HQ: UKLaw Services | March 15: Winding down Moscow operations | |
 | Kennedys Law HQ: UKLaw Services | March 1: Closed Moscow office (3 lawyers) | |
 | Latham & Watkins HQ: USALaw Services | March 9: Wind down of Moscow presence | |
 | Linklaters HQ: UKLaw | March 4: Wind down operations in Russia, close Moscow office (70 laywers incl 10 partners) | |
 | Mannheimer Swartling HQ: SwedenLaw | ||
 | Morgan Lewis & Bockius HQ: USALaw Services | March 9: Closing office in Russia | |
 | Norton Rose Fulbright HQ: UKLaw Services | March 7: Ending operations in Russia | |
 | Sidley Austin HQ: USALaw Services | February 25: Dropped VTB Group as a client | |
 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom HQ: USALaw Services | March 14: Winding down Moscow office | |
 | Squire Patton Boggs HQ: USALaw Services | March 15: Departing Russian market | |
 | White & Case HQ: USALaw Services | March 11: Close Moscow office, suspend respresentation for all Russian/Belarusian-state entities | |
 | Winston & Strawn HQ: USALaw Services | March 10: Closed Russia office |
COALITION
FOR
UKRAINE
HOW YOU CAN HELP
REPORT
Do you know a company still operating in Russia?
Anonymously (or not) provide us the details.
VOLUNTEER
Can you donate some time to the cause?
Please fill out the form below with how you can help.
FAQ
Why does it matter whether or not companies pull out of Russia?
These companies want to be on the right side of history in the eyes of their customers, employees, and shareholders. Their actions absolutely matter and will make a difference. The Kremlin cannot win this economic war, and the oligarchs of Russia are now starting to openly speak up against Putin.
What are your data sources?
We rely on the most authoritative sources available online, including public announcements by corporations and online media sources as attributed in the "source" column.
How do you define "pulling out of Russia"? If a company is not shutting down 100% of Russian operations, what threshold do you use?
Most companies that are withdrawing from the Russian market are not shutting down 100% of their Russian operations. We try to ascertain how material the pullback is relative to the company's overall business within Russia, and if it is a significant reduction, then we will give the company credit for it. Conversely, if a company has announced that it is shutting a portion of its Russian business, but we have determined that the affected businesses is in fact a relatively small portion of the overall business, then we will still call attention to the company needing to do more.
Am I hurting the average Russian citizen by encouraging businesses to leave?
Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine can be repulsed on the ground and through economic pressure. In fact, if the ground war slows to a stalemate, the economic war is increasingly important. We believe the most helpful way for us to take action is to urgently encourage major businesses to cease business ties with Russia. This economic pressure will help expedite an end to the war.
Who created this website and why?
Alex Algard, a tech entrepreneur, created this website, and he provides ongoing support for a professional team of web development, research, and data entry staff. As a concerned citizen, he felt compelled to do something in support of Ukraine.
Developed by Imaginary Cloud